Age is not a sole predictor of outcomes in octogenarians undergoing complex endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the perioperative, postoperative, and long-term outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) in octogenarians compared with nonoctogenarians. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Vascular Quality Improvement database, which prospectively captures information on patients who undergo vascular surgery across 1021 academic and community hospitals in North America. All patients who underwent F/BEVAR endovascular aortic repair from 2012 to 2022 were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: those aged <80 years and those aged ≥80 years at the time of the procedure. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included aortic-specific mortality and aortic-specific reintervention. RESULTS: A total of 6007 patients (aged <80 years, n = 4860; aged ≥80 years, n = 1147) who had undergone F/BEVAR procedures were included. No significant difference was found in technical success, postoperative length of stay, length of intensive care unit stay, postoperative bowel ischemia, and spinal cord ischemia. After adjustment for baseline covariates, octogenarians were more likely to suffer from a postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16; [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.37], P < .001) and be discharged to a rehabilitation center (OR: 1.60; [95% CI: 1.27-2.00], P < .001) or nursing home (OR: 2.23; [95% CI: 1.64-3.01], P < .001). Five-year survival was lower in octogenarians (83% vs 71%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.70; [95% CI: 1.46-2.0], P < .0001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that age was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.72, [95% CI: 1.39-2.12], P < .001) and aortic-specific mortality (HR: 1.92, [95% CI: 1.04-3.68], P = .038). Crawford extent II aortic disease was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (HR 1.49; [95% CI: 1.01-2.19], P < .001), aortic-specific mortality (HR: 5.05; [95% CI: 1.35-18.9], P = .016), and aortic-specific reintervention (HR: 1.91; [95% CI: 1.24-2.93], P = .003). Functional dependence was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 2.90; [95% CI: 1.87-4.51], P < .001) and aortic-specific mortality (HR: 4.93; [95% CI: 1.69-14.4], P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that octogenarians do have a mildly increased mortality rate and rate of adverse events after F/BEVAR procedures. Despite this, when adjusted for other risk factors, on par with other medical comorbidities and therefore age should be strict exclusion criterion for F/BEVAR procedures, rather age should be considered in the global context of patient's aortic anatomy, health, and functional status.

Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for Patients With PAD.

Importance: Endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease (PAD) carries nonnegligible perioperative risks; however, outcome prediction tools are limited. Objective: To develop machine learning (ML) algorithms that can predict outcomes following endovascular intervention for PAD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included patients who underwent endovascular intervention for PAD between January 1, 2004, and July 5, 2023, with 1 year of follow-up. Data were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), a multicenter registry containing data from vascular surgeons and interventionalists at more than 1000 academic and community hospitals. From an initial cohort of 262 242 patients, 26 565 were excluded due to treatment for acute limb ischemia (n = 14 642) or aneurysmal disease (n = 3456), unreported symptom status (n = 4401) or procedure type (n = 2319), or concurrent bypass (n = 1747). Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Exposures: A total of 112 predictive features (75 preoperative [demographic and clinical], 24 intraoperative [procedural], and 13 postoperative [in-hospital course and complications]) from the index hospitalization were identified. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 ML models were trained using preoperative features to predict 1-year major adverse limb event (MALE; composite of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, surgical reintervention, or major amputation) or death. The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). After selecting the best performing algorithm, additional models were built using intraoperative and postoperative data. Results: Overall, 235 677 patients who underwent endovascular intervention for PAD were included (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [11.1] years; 94 979 [40.3%] female) and 71 683 (30.4%) developed 1-year MALE or death. The best preoperative prediction model was extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), achieving the following performance metrics: AUROC, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95); accuracy, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.87); sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.85; positive predictive value, 0.85; and negative predictive value, 0.87. In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65-0.69). The XGBoost model maintained excellent performance at the intraoperative and postoperative stages, with AUROCs of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, ML models were developed that accurately predicted outcomes following endovascular intervention for PAD, which performed better than logistic regression. These algorithms have potential for important utility in guiding perioperative risk-mitigation strategies to prevent adverse outcomes following endovascular intervention for PAD.

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Suprainguinal bypass for peripheral artery disease (PAD) carries important surgical risks; however, outcome prediction tools remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent suprainguinal bypass for PAD between 2003 and 2023. We identified 100 potential predictor variables from the index hospitalization (68 preoperative [demographic/clinical], 13 intraoperative [procedural], and 19 postoperative [in-hospital course/complications]). The primary outcomes were major adverse limb events (MALE; composite of untreated loss of patency, thrombectomy/thrombolysis, surgical revision, or major amputation) or death at 1 year following suprainguinal bypass. Our data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we trained six ML models using preoperative features (Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The best performing algorithm was further trained using intra- and postoperative data. Model robustness was evaluated using calibration plots and Brier scores. Performance was assessed on subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, median Area Deprivation Index, symptom status, procedure type, prior intervention for PAD, concurrent interventions, and urgency. RESULTS: Overall, 16,832 patients underwent suprainguinal bypass, and 3136 (18.6%) developed 1-year MALE or death. Patients with 1-year MALE or death were older (mean age, 64.9 vs 63.5 years; P < .001) with more comorbidities, had poorer functional status (65.7% vs 80.9% independent at baseline; P < .001), and were more likely to have chronic limb-threatening ischemia (67.4% vs 47.6%; P < .001) than those without an outcome. Despite being at higher cardiovascular risk, they were less likely to receive acetylsalicylic acid or statins preoperatively and at discharge. Our best performing prediction model at the preoperative stage was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.93). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65-0.69). Our XGBoost model maintained excellent performance at the intra- and postoperative stages, with AUROCs of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.94) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with Brier scores of 0.12 (preoperative), 0.11 (intraoperative), and 0.10 (postoperative). Of the top 10 predictors, nine were preoperative features including chronic limb-threatening ischemia, previous procedures, comorbidities, and functional status. Model performance remained robust on all subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We developed ML models that accurately predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass, performing better than logistic regression. Our algorithms have potential for important utility in guiding perioperative risk mitigation strategies to prevent adverse outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.

Using Machine Learning (XGBoost) to Predict Outcomes After Infrainguinal Bypass for Peripheral Artery Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To develop machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict outcomes after infrainguinal bypass. BACKGROUND: Infrainguinal bypass for peripheral artery disease carries significant surgical risks; however, outcome prediction tools remain limited. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass for peripheral artery disease between 2003 and 2023. We identified 97 potential predictor variables from the index hospitalization [68 preoperative (demographic/clinical), 13 intraoperative (procedural), and 16 postoperative (in-hospital course/complications)]. The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse limb event (composite of surgical revision, thrombectomy/thrombolysis, or major amputation) or death. Our data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we trained 6 ML models using preoperative features. The primary model evaluation metric was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The top-performing algorithm was further trained using intraoperative and postoperative features. Model robustness was evaluated using calibration plots and Brier scores. RESULTS: Overall, 59,784 patients underwent infrainguinal bypass, and 15,942 (26.7%) developed 1-year major adverse limb event/death. The best preoperative prediction model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.93-0.95). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.61 (0.59-0.63). Our XGBoost model maintained excellent performance at the intraoperative and postoperative stages, with AUROCs (95% CI's) of 0.94 (0.93-0.95) and 0.96 (0.95-0.97), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with Brier scores of 0.08 (preoperative), 0.07 (intraoperative), and 0.05 (postoperative). CONCLUSIONS: ML models can accurately predict outcomes after infrainguinal bypass, outperforming logistic regression.

Machine learning to predict outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) carries important perioperative risks; however, there are no widely used outcome prediction tools. The aim of this study was to apply machine learning (ML) to develop automated algorithms that predict 1-year mortality following EVAR. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify patients who underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal AAA between 2003 and 2023. Input features included 47 preoperative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Data were split into training (70 per cent) and test (30 per cent) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 ML models were trained using preoperative features with logistic regression as the baseline comparator. The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was evaluated with calibration plot and Brier score. RESULTS: Some 63 655 patients were included. One-year mortality occurred in 3122 (4.9 per cent) patients. The best performing prediction model for 1-year mortality was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95 per cent c.i.) of 0.96 (0.95-0.97). Comparatively, logistic regression had an AUROC (95 per cent c.i.) of 0.69 (0.68-0.71). The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.04. The top 3 predictive features in the algorithm were 1) unfit for open AAA repair, 2) functional status, and 3) preoperative dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this data set, machine learning was able to predict 1-year mortality following EVAR using preoperative data and outperformed standard logistic regression models.

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains challenging with a lack of widely used tools to guide perioperative management. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict outcomes following open AAA repair. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify patients who underwent elective open AAA repair between 2003 and 2023. Input features included 52 preoperative demographic/clinical variables. All available preoperative variables from VQI were used to maximize predictive performance. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death). Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, other in-hospital complications, and 1-year mortality and any reintervention. We split our data into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, six ML models were trained using preoperative features (Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model robustness was evaluated with calibration plot and Brier score. The top 10 predictive features in our final model were determined based on variable importance scores. Performance was assessed on subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, median area deprivation index, proximal clamp site, prior aortic surgery, and concomitant procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 12,027 patients were included. The primary outcome of in-hospital MACE occurred in 630 patients (5.2%). Compared with patients without a primary outcome, those who developed in-hospital MACE were older with more comorbidities, demonstrated poorer functional status, had more complex aneurysms, and were more likely to require concomitant procedures. Our best performing prediction model for in-hospital MACE was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.94). Comparatively, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.73). For secondary outcomes, XGBoost achieved AUROCs between 0.84 and 0.94. The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.05. These findings highlight the excellent predictive performance of the XGBoost model. The top three predictive features in our algorithm for in-hospital MACE following open AAA repair were: (1) coronary artery disease; (2) American Society of Anesthesiologists classification; and (3) proximal clamp site. Model performance remained robust on all subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Open AAA repair outcomes can be accurately predicted using preoperative data with our ML models, which perform better than logistic regression. Our automated algorithms can help guide risk-mitigation strategies for patients being considered for open AAA repair to improve outcomes.

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of outcomes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains challenging, with a lack of standardized tools to guide perioperative management. We used machine learning (ML) to develop automated algorithms that predict outcomes following CEA. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify patients who underwent CEA between 2003 and 2022. We identified 71 potential predictor variables (features) from the index hospitalization (43 preoperative [demographic/clinical], 21 intraoperative [procedural], and 7 postoperative [in-hospital complications]). The primary outcome was stroke or death at 1 year following CEA. Our data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we trained six ML models using preoperative features (Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], random forest, Naïve Bayes classifier, support vector machine, artificial neural network, and logistic regression). The primary model evaluation metric was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). After selecting the best performing algorithm, additional models were built using intra- and postoperative data. Model robustness was evaluated using calibration plots and Brier scores. Performance was assessed on subgroups based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance status, symptom status, and urgency of surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 166,369 patients underwent CEA during the study period. In total, 7749 patients (4.7%) had the primary outcome of stroke or death at 1 year. Patients with an outcome were older with more comorbidities, had poorer functional status, and demonstrated higher risk anatomic features. They were also more likely to undergo intraoperative surgical re-exploration and have in-hospital complications. Our best performing prediction model at the preoperative stage was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.91). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and existing tools in the literature demonstrate AUROCs ranging from 0.58 to 0.74. Our XGBoost models maintained excellent performance at the intra- and postoperative stages, with AUROCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-0.91) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95), respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with Brier scores of 0.15 (preoperative), 0.14 (intraoperative), and 0.11 (postoperative). Of the top 10 predictors, eight were preoperative features, including comorbidities, functional status, and previous procedures. Model performance remained robust on all subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We developed ML models that accurately predict outcomes following CEA. Our algorithms perform better than logistic regression and existing tools, and therefore, have potential for important utility in guiding perioperative risk mitigation strategies to prevent adverse outcomes.

The Impact of Heparin on Mortality Following Open Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Systemic administration of heparin is widely used in patients undergoing open elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. However, no clear consensus exists in the use of intraoperative heparin during open ruptured AAA (rAAA) repair. In this study, we assessed the safety of intravenous heparin administration in patients undergoing open rAAA repair. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients who received and did not receive heparin during open rAAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2003 and 2020 was conducted. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 10-year mortality. The secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, number of packed red blood cells transfused, early postoperative transfusions, and postsurgical complications. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potentially confounding variables. The outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using relative risk for binary outcomes and paired t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. Survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 2,410 patients who underwent open rAAA repair between 2003 and 2020 were studied. Of the 2,410 patients, 1,853 patients received intraoperative heparin and 557 did not. Propensity score matching on 25 variables yielded 519 pairs for the heparin to no heparin comparison. Thirty-day mortality was lower in the heparin group (risk ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.84) and in-hospital was also lower in the heparin group (risk ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.77). Furthermore, estimated blood loss was 910 mL (95% CI: 230 mL to 1,590 mL) lower in the heparin group and the mean number of packed red blood cells transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively were 17 units lower in the heparin group (95% CI: 8-42). Ten-year survival was higher for patients who received heparin, and their rate of survival was approximately 40% higher than those who did not receive heparin (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received systemic heparin administration at the time of open rAAA repair, there were significant short-term and long-term survival benefits within 30 days and at 10 years. Heparin administration may have afforded a mortality benefit or been a surrogate for healthier and less moribund patients at the time of the procedure.

The impact of race on outcomes following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: Racial differences in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes have been previously reported; however, data on racial differences in ruptured AAA (rAAA) repair outcomes remain limited. This study assessed in-hospital and long-term mortality after rAAA repair in Black versus White patients. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried to identify all Black and White patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair between 2003 and 2019. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and independent t test and χ2 test were performed to assess differences between groups. In-hospital and 8-year mortality rates were the primary outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted to analyze associations between race and outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 310 Black patients and 4679 White patients underwent rAAA repair. A greater proportion of Black patients underwent endovascular repair (73.2% vs 56.1%). Black patients had a lower mean age and were more likely to be female, with a greater proportion being Medicaid insured (9.7% vs 2.1%) or uninsured (4.8% vs 3.3%). Although Black patients were more likely to be current smokers and have hypertension, diabetes, and congestive heart failure, they were not more likely to receive risk reduction medications. The time from symptom onset to incision or access was higher for Black patients (median, 12.0 hours vs 7.0 hours). Similarly, the time from hospital admission to intervention was higher for Black patients (median, 2.8 hours vs 1.3 hours). In-hospital mortality was lower in Black patients (20.0% vs 28.6%; odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.83); however, this did not persist after adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.30-1.07; P = .09). Furthermore, the 8-year survival was not different between groups (50.4% vs 46.6%; hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57-1.26; P = .42), even when stratified by repair type. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified racial differences in demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics for patients undergoing rAAA repair. In particular, the door-to-intervention time for Black patients of 2.8 hours does not meet the Society for Vascular Surgery recommendation of 90 minutes. Despite these differences, the 8-year mortality is similar for Black and White patients. These differences should be investigated further, and there are opportunities to improve rAAA care for Black patients.

Vascular surgical management of profunda femoris artery aneurysms: A single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Profunda femoris artery aneurysms (PFAAs), which comprise true profunda femoris artery aneurysms (TPFAAs) and profunda femoris artery pseudoaneuryms (PFA PSAs), are rare but clinically significant diseases of the peripheral arterial vasculature. Our aim is to describe our institution's 15-year experience with PFAAs (TPFAAs and PFA PSAs) to provide insight into patient characteristics, diagnostic imaging modalities, and surgical interventions that contribute to clinically important outcomes in patients with PFAAs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at our institution using our radiology database. RESULTS: We identified six patients with PFA PSAs and four patients with TPFAAs. The clinical presentation of PFA PSAs included a triad of thigh pain, bleeding, and unexplained anemia. There was variety in the aetiologies of PFA PSAs, arising from catheterizations, upper thigh fractures, anastomotic complications, or unknown causes. Most patients with PFA PSAs had hypertension and coronary artery disease, and half of our cohort had peripheral vascular disease. All patients were imaged with duplex ultrasonography (DUS) or computed tomography (CT), the latter being more accurate. All patients with PFA PSAs underwent endovascular treatment, including glue, thrombin, or coil embolization as well as stent-graft insertions. All TPFAAs presented to our center were small and incidentally discovered, explaining the conservative management of our TPFAAs. Two of the four TPFAAs were idiopathic in nature, while one was attributed to post-stenotic dilatation, and another was found in a patient with Ehlers Danlos Syndrome. There was an association between TPFAAs and multiple synchronous or asynchronous aneurysms. CONCLUSION: Pseudoaneurysms of the PFA are mostly iatrogenic in nature and can present with the triad of thigh swelling, bleeding, and unexplained anemia. If the clinical picture is suggestive of a PFA PSA but DUS does not detect a pseudoaneurysm, CT may be added as a more accurate imaging modality. Endovascular embolization is used in smaller pseudoaneurysms and in poor surgical candidates. Multiple glue, coil, or thrombin injections may be required to fully thrombose the pseudoaneurysm sac. True aneurysms of the PFA are associated with synchronous/asynchronous aneurysms and small TPFAAs should be carefully monitored, as there is a risk of enlargement and rupture.

The Impact of Sex on Outcomes following Carotid Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated significant sex differences in vascular surgery outcomes. We assessed stroke or death rates following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in women versus men. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was used to identify all patients who underwent CEA between 2010 and 2019. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were recorded and differences between women and men were assessed using independent t-test and chi-squared test. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year stroke or death. Associations between sex and outcomes were assessed using univariate/multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 52,137 women and 79,974 men underwent CEA in Vascular Quality Initiative sites during the study period. Women were younger (70.3 vs. 70.5 years, P < 0.001) and more likely to have hypertension (89.2% vs. 88.9%, P < 0.05) and diabetes (36.2% vs. 35.8%, P < 0.001) but less likely to be diagnosed with coronary artery disease (23.2% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.001). A greater proportion of men were receiving cardiovascular risk reduction medications and had symptomatic carotid stenosis (28.5% vs. 26.7%, P < 0.001). Women had shorter procedure times (113 vs. 122 min, P < 0.001) and were less likely to receive electroencephalography neuromonitoring (27.9% vs. 28.8%, P < 0.001), drain (35.9% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.001), and protamine (67.4% vs. 68.0%, P < 0.01). Stroke or death at 30 days (1.9% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.60) and 1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.01, P = 0.20) were similar between groups, which persisted in asymptomatic patients (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.01, P = 0.17) and symptomatic patients (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05, P = 0.71). The similarities in 1-year stroke or death rates existed in both the United States (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.01, P = 0.09) and Canada (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.47-3.11, P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Despite sex differences in clinical and procedural characteristics, women and men have similar 30-day and 1-year outcomes following CEA.

Vascular Complications With Intra-aortic Balloon Pump (IABP): Experience From a Large Canadian Metropolitan Centre.

Background: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion in critically ill patients has been associated with both vascular and nonvascular complications, which have restricted its use. The primary objective for this study was to determine the frequency and predictors of vascular complication in our centre. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients treated with an IABP between January 2014 and June 2018. Baseline clinical characteristics, cannulation details, duration of treatment and management, overall mortality, and complications were extracted from electronic and paper medical records. Results: A total of 187 patients required an IABP; of these, 146 were male (78.1%), the average age was 65.2 ± 11.5 years, and body mass index was 26.8 ± 6.2 kg/m2. A majority of the patients had an IABP inserted in either the cardiac catheterization laboratory (54.5%) or an outside hospital (26.7%). The main indications for insertion were acute decompensated heart failure-cardiogenic shock (58.3%), followed by acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (26.2%). From the documented cannulation site, the right femoral artery was cannulated in 61.6% of patients, with a median size of 7.5 Fr (range: 5 -12 Fr). Mortality for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality was calculated at 37.4%, 40.6%, and 41.7%, respectively. Limb ischemia (3.2%), bleeding (1.6%), mesenteric ischemia (0.5%), compartment syndrome (0.5%), and fasciotomy (0.5%), were rare occurrences. No records indicated amputation, aortoiliac dissection, thrombectomy, or infection at the site of insertion. Conclusions: This single-centre retrospective study demonstrated that more than one third of this patient population died secondary to their primary diagnosis. The incidence of vascular complications secondary to IABP insertion remained low, with less than 3% developing an ischemic limb.

Contexte: L'insertion d'un ballon de contrepulsion intra-aortique (BCPIA) chez les patients dont l'état est critique est associée à des complications à la fois vasculaires et non vasculaires, ce qui limite son utilisation. L'objectif principal de cette étude était de déterminer la fréquence des complications vasculaires dans notre centre ainsi que les facteurs prédictifs de ces complications. Méthodologie: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective auprès de patients traités consécutivement par BCPIA entre janvier 2014 et juin 2018. Les caractéristiques cliniques initiales, les détails sur la canulation, la durée du traitement et de la prise en charge, la mortalité globale et les complications ont été extraits des dossiers médicaux électroniques et en format papier. Résultats: Au total, un BCPIA a été nécessaire chez 187 patients; 146 d'entre eux étaient des hommes (78,1 %), l'âge moyen était de 65,2 ± 11,5 ans, et l'indice de masse corporelle moyen était de 26,8 ± 6,2 kg/m2. La majorité des insertions de BCPIA s'étaient déroulées soit dans le laboratoire de cathétérisme (54,5 %) ou dans un hôpital externe (26,7 %). Les principales indications pour lesquelles ces insertions ont été effectuées étaient l'insuffisance cardiaque aiguë décompensée avec choc cardiogénique (58,3 %), suivie de l'infarctus du myocarde aigu avec choc cardiogénique (26,2 %). Selon les sites de canulation documentés, l'artère fémorale droite avait été canulée chez 61,6 % des patients, avec un calibre médian de 7,5 Fr (de 5 à 12 Fr). Les valeurs de mortalité à l'hôpital, à 30 jours et à un an, ont été établies à 37,4 %, 40,6 % et 41,7 %, respectivement. L'ischémie d'un membre (3,2 %), l'hémorragie (1,6 %), l'ischémie mésentérique (0,5 %), le syndrome des loges (0,5 %) et la fasciotomie (0,5 %) ont été constatés dans quelques rares cas. Aucun dossier n'indiquait d'amputation, de dissection aorto-iliaque, de thrombectomie ou d'infection au point d'insertion. Conclusions: Cette étude de cohorte rétrospective unicentrique a permis de démontrer que plus d'un tiers des patients de la population à l'étude sont décédés des suites de leur diagnostic primaire. L'incidence de complications vasculaires secondaires à l'insertion d'un BCPIA est demeurée faible, avec moins de 3 % des patients présentant une ischémie d'un membre.

Outcomes of hybrid procedures for peripheral arterial disease: 5-year single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to present patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) who underwent hybrid procedures at our institution, the results of these interventions for a 5-year period and determine patency, mortality, failure, and amputation rates compared to the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, single center, retrospective, and cross-sectional study which analyzed data gathered from the vascular quality initiative from patients who had hybrid revascularization procedures from January 2010 to December 2015. RESULTS: 87 patients were identified: 51 (58%) male, 36 (41%) female, 9 (10%) had critical limb ischemia (CLI), and 78 (90%) claudication. We analyzed results of hybrid interventions in their variations. Technical success rate was 100%, patency at 2 years 88.5% (primary 65%, primary-assisted 18.3%, and secondary 4.5%) and 11.49% failure rate (lost patency < 1 year, conversion to open or/and amputation). Predictors of failure were: Female, previous chronic heart failure, longer length of stay, and previously transferred from another hospital. Amputation rate was 12.6% (10.3% major and 2.2% minor amputation), the only significant predictor was age (p = 0.035, odds ratio = 0.89) (0.806-99). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid procedures are effective to treat patients with either CLI or claudication. Our study had outcomes comparable to the literature, with similar patency, amputation, and complication rates. We conclude it is a safe and effective option for PVD with multi-level disease.

OBJETIVO: Presentar pacientes con EAP que requirieron procedimientos híbridos en nuestra institución, resultados en 1 periodo de 5 años y determinar permeabilidad, mortalidad, falla y rangos de amputación comparado con la literatura. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional un céntrico, retrospectivo y transversal que analizó datos obtenidos del VQI de pacientes post-revascularización híbrida de Enero 2010 a Diciembre 2015. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 87 pacientes: 51 masculinos (58%) y 34 femeninos (41%). 9 (10%) presentaron isquemia crítica, 78 (90%) claudicación. Se analizaron resultados de dichas intervenciones en sus variaciones, con éxito técnico 100%, permeabilidad a 2 años 88.5% (primaria 65%, primaria asistida 18.3%, secundaria 4.5%) y 11.49% de falla (pérdida de permeabilidad < 1 año, conversión a cirugía abierta y/o amputación). Predictores de falla: femenino, IC, larga EIH, traslado de hospital previo). El rango de amputación fue 12.6% (10.3% mayor, 2-2% amputación menor) y el único predictor significativo fue edad (p = 0.035, OR = 0.89) (0.806-99). CONCLUSIONES: Los procedimientos híbridos son efectivos para tratar pacientes con isquemia crítica o claudicación. Nuestro estudio tuvo resultados similares a la literatura,permeabilidad, riesgo de amputación y complicaciones comparables con lo descrito. Concluimos que es una opción segura y efectiva para tratar pacientes con EAP multinivel.

Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Importance: Sex differences in aortic surgery outcomes are commonly reported. However, data on ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair outcomes in women vs men are limited. Objective: To assess differences in perioperative and long-term mortality following rAAA repair in women vs men. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Vascular Quality Initiative database, which prospectively captures information on patients who undergo vascular surgery across 796 academic and community hospitals in North America. All patients who underwent endovascular or open rAAA repair between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2019, were included. Outcomes were assessed up to January 1, 2020. Exposures: Patient sex. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were recorded, and differences between women vs men were assessed using independent t test and χ2 test. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 8-year mortality. Associations between sex and outcomes were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: A total of 1160 (21.9%) women and 4148 (78.1%) men underwent rAAA repair during the study period. There was a similar proportion of endovascular repairs in women and men (654 [56.4%] vs 2386 [57.5%]). Women were older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [9.3] vs 71.7 [9.6] years), more likely to have chronic kidney disease (718 [61.9%] vs 2184 [52.7%]), and presented with ruptured aneurysms of smaller diameters (mean [SD] 68 [18.2] vs 78 [30.2] mm). In-hospital mortality was higher in women (34.4% vs 26.6%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.25-1.66), which persisted after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12-1.66; P = .002). Eight-year survival was lower in women (36.7% vs 49.5%; hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.50; P = .02), which persisted when stratified by endovascular and open repair. This survival difference existed in both the US and Canada. Variables associated with long-term mortality in women included older age and chronic kidney disease. Conclusions and Relevance: Women who underwent rAAA repair had higher perioperative and 8-year mortality rates following both endovascular and open repair compared with men. Older age and higher rates of chronic kidney disease in women were associated with higher mortality rates. These findings suggest that future studies should assess the reasons for these disparities and whether opportunities exist to improve AAA care for women.

Association Between Sarcopenia and Adverse Events Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, the age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass/function, has been identified as a marker of frailty. We examined the association between sarcopenia and adverse events following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Toronto General Hospital. All patients who underwent TAVI in the time period 2007-2017 with preoperative computed tomography were included. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated radiographically using psoas muscle area at the L3 vertebral level, divided by height. Various measures of sarcopenia, including mean SMI, SMI below the sex-specific median, and SMI in the lowest sex-specific quartile were calculated. The primary outcome was postoperative adverse events, defined as a composite of in-hospital mortality and morbidity including cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurologic, access-related, and gastrointestinal complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the association between sarcopenia and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients (mean age: 80.7 years) were included. Baseline comorbidity burden was high, particularly congestive heart failure (93.4%). Postoperative adverse events occurred in 62 patients (13.2%). Univariate logistic regression demonstrated that postoperative adverse events were correlated with mean SMI (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interal [CI] 0.66-0.97), events were less than the SMI (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.24-3.84), and SMI in the sex-specific lowest quartile (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.33-4.07). On multivariate analysis, SMI in the sex-specific lowest quartile was an independent predictor of adverse events (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.41-4.50). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia defined by radiologic psoas muscle measurements was independently associated with in-hospital mortality and morbidity following TAVI.

CONTEXTE: La sarcopénie, soit la perte de masse et de fonction des muscles squelettiques liée à l'âge, a été identifiée comme un marqueur de fragilité. Nous avons examiné l'association entre la sarcopénie et les événements indésirables suivant l'implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter (IVAC). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Une étude de cohorte rétrospective a été menée au Toronto General Hospital. Tous les patients ayant subi une IVAC avec tomodensitométrie préopératoire au cours de la période 2007-2017 ont été inclus. L'indice de masse musculaire squelettique (IMMS) a été calculé par radiographie en utilisant la surface du psoas au niveau de la vertèbre L3, divisée par la taille. Diverses mesures de la sarcopénie, y compris l'IMMS moyen, l'IMMS sous la médiane selon le sexe et l'IMMS dans le quartile inférieur selon le sexe, ont été calculées. Le critère d'évaluation principal était les événements indésirables postopératoires, définis comme un critère composite comprenant la mortalité et la morbidité à l'hôpital, notamment les complications cardiovasculaires, pulmonaires, neurologiques, gastro-intestinales et liées à l'accès vasculaire. Des régressions logistiques univariée et multivariée ont été effectuées pour déterminer l'association entre la sarcopénie et les événements indésirables. RÉSULTATS: Un total de 468 patients (âge moyen : 80,7 ans) ont été inclus. Le fardeau de comorbidité au départ était élevé, en particulier pour ce qui est de l'insuffisance cardiaque congestive (93,4 %). Des événements indésirables postopératoires sont survenus chez 62 patients (13,2 %). La régression logistique univariée a montré que les événements indésirables postopératoires étaient en corrélation avec un IMMS moyen (rapport des cotes [RC] : 0,81, intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 0,66 à 0,97), un IMMS sous la médiane selon le sexe (RC : 2,16; IC à 95 % : 1,24 à 3,84) et un IMMS dans le quartile inférieur selon le sexe (RC : 2,34; IC à 95 % : 1,33 à 4,07). Lors de l'analyse multivariée, un IMMS situé dans le quartile inférieur selon le sexe était un prédicteur indépendant d'événements indésirables (RC : 2,53; IC à 95 % : 1,41 à 4,50). CONCLUSIONS: La sarcopénie définie par les mesures radiologiques du psoas était indépendamment associée à la mortalité et à la morbidité à l'hôpital à la suite d'une IVAC.

SUPERA Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery: Early Experience and Practical Considerations.

PURPOSE: Endovascular therapy in the management of de novo common femoral disease remains controversial. Considerable interest has been generated in recent years due to recent technological advancement in the design of vascular stents. In particular, SUPERA (Abbot Vascular Inc, Santa Clara USA) stents are designed to offer increased flexibility and less adverse interactions with the arterial wall, thus making it potentially better suited for common femoral lesions. However, despite such theoretical advantages, there is lack of data in its use in clinical practice. This study provides illustrative examples of SUPERA stents in different clinical settings and contributes to important clinical data for the overall efficacy and safety profile of endovascular interventions in common femoral artery (CFA) disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all endovascular CFA procedures between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, was conducted. Data collected included demographics, clinical symptoms, medical comorbidities, procedural characteristics, and immediate and short-term complications. Detailed analysis was performed on the stenting cohort. RESULTS: During our study period, a total of 69 patients underwent endovascular interventions involving the CFA at our institution, of which 16 patients had stenting procedures for a total of 18 stent deployments. Technical success was achieved in all stenting procedures. A total of 15 SUPERA stents were placed in 13 patients. No stent fractures were observed. Overall primary patency rate of SUPERA stents at the time of 12-month follow-up was 100% in patients who had a follow-up assessment (n = 12 stents). CONCLUSION: Endovascular intervention of the CFA is an evolving topic in the interventional radiology and vascular surgery community. Recent development of newer generation of devices such as SUPERA peripheral stents offers significant potential benefits given their inherent design. Despite the theoretically promising design of the SUPERA, there is a lack of data to support its use. This study contributes important patient-level data for SUPERA stent deployments.

Assessment of open surgical and endovascular management of true hepatic artery aneurysms over 20 years highlights increased rupture risk in females.

BACKGROUND: True hepatic artery aneurysms (HAAs) are rare but have been associated with a significant risk of rupture and associated mortality. The 2020 release of HAA-specific clinical practice guidelines represented an important step toward management standardization. However, it remains essential to build on the body of evidence to further refine these recommendations. METHODS: The HAA management and outcomes from a single academic center during a 20-year period were retrospectively reviewed. We identified 72 patients from the institutional radiology database (November 24, 1999 to 2019). Pseudoaneurysms were excluded, and 48 patients were found to have had true HAAs. Forty-three HAA patients had sufficient medical records for inclusion in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients with HAA included, 65% were male. The mean age was 63 years (range, 22-89 years). Of the HAAs, 72% presented asymptomatically, 16% had ruptured, and 12% were symptomatic at presentation. Most HAAs were of atherosclerotic origin (74%). In addition, 16% of the patients had other visceral aneurysms and 12% had nonvisceral aneurysms on presentation. The mean HAA size overall was 3.3 cm (range, 0.8-10.8 cm), with most being solitary (72%) and involving the common hepatic artery (65%). Rupture was more common in females (40%) and those with vasculitis (67%), with females representing 86% of all patients with rupture. The mean size at intervention was 4.8 cm (21 patients [49%]). Ten patients (23%) had undergone open surgical repair (seven elective and three emergent because of rupture). Eleven patients (26%) had undergone endovascular intervention (64% elective and 36% emergent). Nonoperative management was selected for 22 patients (51%). These patients had a mean HAA diameter of 2.1 cm, and 59% had a life-limiting illness. Of the 18 patients who had been initially monitored for a mean of 3.9 ± 4.1 years, 3 had undergone elective repair and 2 had minimal growth. None of these patients had a subsequently documented rupture. CONCLUSIONS: True HAAs are a rare but important clinical phenomenon, with 16% of patients presenting with rupture in this study. Endovascular intervention is a promising alternative to open surgical repair, with no 30-day mortality, and is suitable for ruptured HAAs. Importantly, for the first time, our findings have demonstrated an increased risk of rupture for females, highlighting the need for additional data and ultimately, sex-specific guidelines.